Health Connect Australia Provider Directory FHIR Implementation Guide - Local Development build (v26.0.0) built by the FHIR (HL7® FHIR® Standard) Build Tools. See the Directory of published versions
This page records the conformance expectations for the Health Connect Provider Directory Implementation Guide. The IG defines two client actors:
Client systems SHALL claim conformance to a minimum of one actor, but are not required to be conformant to both actors.
As a healthcare provider-focused implementation guide, conformance requirements are centred on client systems' ability to parse, validate, and consume FHIR resources that conform to the HC profile specifications. Implementations SHALL demonstrate profile conformance by respecting the data structures defined in profiles and adhering to the structural definitions, cardinality constraints, invariants, and terminology bindings specified within the HC profiles when processing resources retrieved from the Health Connect Provider Directory.
Client systems claiming conformance as a Health Connect Provider Directory Requester Actor SHALL be able to correctly interpret and process resources conforming to the following target profiles, respecting their defined data structures:
Client systems claiming conformance as a Bulk Export Requester Actor SHALL be able to correctly interpret and process bulk exported resources conforming to the following target profiles, respecting their defined data structures:
For the profiles above, Health Connect Provider Directory Requester Actors SHOULD support discovery and retrieval operations (for example search and read) while ensuring they can correctly parse and utilize the structured data according to profile specifications. See the FHIR HTTP operations documentation (FHIR HTTP operations) and the AU Core general requirements (AU Core general requirements) for full details. Health Connect Provider Directory Requester Actors SHOULD consult the target Server's CapabilityStatement to determine the exact set of supported interactions.
Where a SearchParameter is of type token, the Health Connect Provider Directory Requester Actor SHOULD supply system|code or system|value using the code systems and value sets referenced by the IG. If a system is not available, then a value alone may be supplied. However, implementers must have in place mechanisms that clearly identify or mark matching values belonging to different systems. The published IG and the target server's CapabilityStatement should be consulted for the authoritative list of recommended SearchParameters and the expected token ValueSets. Although some value sets may be preferred rather than required, Requesters are strongly recommended to adopt those value sets where appropriate to maximise interoperability and minimise integration effort. The exception here, being the ValueSet: hl7VS-degreeLicenseCertificate which is applied to Practitioner.qualification.code. This value set is not optimal for the intended use case but is used in lieu of an established alternative.
Within the scope of this IG, the Requester actor is not required to support any SearchParameters, all are marked as SHOULD support. Implementers may leverage SearchParameters defined within this IG (including those inherited) as they see fit in accordance with their own use cases to interact with the Health Connect Provider Directory system.
Health Connect Provider Directory Requesters SHALL correctly handle OperationOutcome responses and non-2xx HTTP responses returned by servers.
Conformance tests SHOULD verify that Requester implementations can:
search and read interactions against Organization and Practitioner profilesThis document is intentionally narrow in scope for the Requester actor.
It is an expectation that Health Connect Provider Directory Requester Actor implementers SHALL be able to handle cases where missing data exists. Where mandatory elements are missing, this will be indicated by the established convention in FHIR, i.e. supplying the extension DataAbsentReason.
A risk-based Provider Directory conformance profile will be developed for connecting systems to mitigate the identified risks and describe desired software behaviours. The software developer must ensure their system behaves in accordance with the desired behaviours outlined in the conformance profile and associated artefacts.
The conformance assessment approach and the associated test specification will be developed for connecting systems. The software developer must demonstrate conformance to the relevant Conformance Profile in addition to meeting the FHIR conformance requirements in section above.